-
Latest post
Armed, Belligerant, Defiant Suspect Need Not Point Weapon at Police to Justify Use of Deadly Force
In Handy v. Jones, published September 15, 2026, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a district court order denying a motion to dismiss. Late at night, the plaintiffs’ decedent’s neighbor called 911 multiple times to report a disturbance between the decedent and his girlfriend. The neighbor reported hearing screaming, a loud thud against the… Keep reading →
-
In Voice of San Diego v. Superior Court (County of San Diego), published July 16, 2021, the Fourth District Court of Appeal, Division 1 declined to issue a writ of mandate disturbing a trial court's decision on a California Public Records Act petition. The petitioner news media organizations made a CPRA request for records showing the… Keep reading →
-
In Lemos v. County of Sonoma, published July 16, 2021, a divided panel of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed summary judgment in favor of defendants in the plaintiff’s suit under 42 U.S.C. section 1983 for alleged use of excessive force. One of the defendant officers saw a pickup truck obstructing a lane of… Keep reading →
-
In Shalabi v. City of Fontana, published July 12, 2021, the California Supreme Court affirmed a lower appellate court's decision that a 42 U.S.C. section 1983 lawsuit against the defendant city was filed within the statute of limitations. The plaintiff alleged that on May 14, 2011, a city police officer wrongfully shot and killed the… Keep reading →
-
In Haytasingh v. City of San Diego, published July 9, 2021, the Fourth District Court of Appeal, Division 1 affirmed in part and reversed in part a decision for the defendant city in a personal injury case. One of the plaintiffs was surfing. A city lifeguard was operating a city-owned personal watercraft on city business. … Keep reading →
-
In Briley v. City of West Covina, published July 1, 2021, the Second District Court of Appeal, Division 4 affirmed in part and reversed in part a judgment after jury trial in favor of the plaintiff in an employment retaliation case. The plaintiff was a deputy fire Marshal. He complained to the city that various… Keep reading →
-
In Pakdel v. City and County of San Francisco, published June 28, 2021, the U.S.U.S. Supreme Court, per curiam vacated and remanded a 9th Circuit decision. Plaintiffs challenged a city requirement that they offer a tenant in a tenancy-in-common a lifetime lease as a condition of converting to condominium ownership. The city refused to exempt them… Keep reading →
-
In Lombardo v. City of St. Louis, published June 28, 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court, in a split per curiam opinion, reversed and remanded a summary judgment granted in favor of police officers. The plaintiffs' decedent was arrested for trespassing and failure to appear in court for a traffic ticket. While he was in jail, the… Keep reading →
-
In Mahoney Area School District v. B.L., published June 23, 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court, ruling 8-1, affirmed a circuit court decision that the defendant school district's discipline of the plaintiff violated the First Amendment. The plaintiff was denied a position on her high school's varsity cheerleading squad and the right fielder position on a private… Keep reading →
-
In Sales v. City of Tustin, published June 8, 2021, the Fourth District Court of Appeal, Division 3 reversed summary judgment in favor of the defendant city, granted based on the statute of limitations. Plaintiff alleges her decedent fled an improper detention, was chased into traffic, and was killed. On the last day to file a… Keep reading →
- Administrative Law
- Anti-SLAPP
- Appealability
- Assumption of the Risk
- Attorney Fees
- Attorney-Client Privilege
- Books
- City Charters
- Civil Procedure
- Claim Procedure
- Coastal Access
- Common Carrier
- Comparative fault
- Conflict of interest
- Contract
- Current Affairs
- Dangerous Conditions of Public Property
- Defense and Indemnity
- Development Impact Fees
- Disabled Persons' Rights
- Discovery
- Due Process
- Elections
- Eminent Domain
- Estoppel
- Evidence
- Excessive Fines
- Federal Civil Rights
- Fees and Costs
- Fiduciary Duty
- Film
- Firearm Regulation
- Firefighters
- Food and Drink
- Forfeitures
- Free Speech
- Homelessness
- Housing Discrimination
- Immigration
- Immunities
- Inverse Condemnation
- Judicial Liability
- Juror Misconduct
- Jury Instructions
- Local Legislators' Liability
- mandatory duty
- Medical
- Minor parties
- Negligence
- Nuisance
- Open Meetings
- Police Liability
- Prisoner's Rights
- Privilege
- Property Regulation
- Prosecutors
- Public Attorneys
- Public Employment
- Public Records Requests
- Punitive Damages
- Quantum Meruit
- Religion
- Respondeat Superior
- Respondeat Superior for Sexual Misconduct
- Sanctions
- School District Liability
- Science
- Settlement
- Social workers
- Special Relationship
- Sports
- standing
- State Law Civil Rights
- statute of limitations
- Suicide
- Summary Judgment
- Tax sales
- Taxpayer's Suits
- Tenant's Rights
- tolling
- Uncategorized
- Vexatious Litigants
- Vicarious Liability
- Web/Tech
- Whistleblowers
- Workers' Compensation
- writ relief
- Zoning